|
It appears that only a highly belligerent minority of the city's inhabitants really wanted a fight with the Romans. A fierce argument broke out in the city within earshot of Titus and his men who then decided to take advantage of the situation by continuing their attack. Titus leapt into his saddle and, "Riding through the water he entered the town at the head of his men. His audacity filled the defenders with terror, and not a man stayed to offer the least resistance. Abandoning their posts, Jeshua and his supporters fled across country while the rest rushed down to the lake where they ran into the enemy advancing to meet them. Some were killed as they got into their boats, others tried to swim to those who had put out before."
Titus mopped up the rebels in Tarichea and accepted the surrender of its residents. Josephus relates: "Those who had taken refuge on the lake, when they saw the town had fallen, put out as far from the enemy as they could." On receiving news of the surrender, Vespasian entered the city to take charge. "The next day he (Vespasian) went down to the lake and ordered rafts to be put together for the pursuit of the fugitives. They were soon ready, as there was an abundance of wood and no lack of carpenters."
Josephus continues, "Preparations completed, Titus put on board as much of his force as he thought adequate to deal with their opponents in the boats, and the pursuit began. Thus encircled, the Jews could neither escape to land where the enemy was in full possession, nor fight it out on the water with any hope of success. Their boats were small and built for piracy, and the men on board each one were so few that they dared not come to grips with the Romans."
None got away...."the entire lake was stained with blood and crammed with corpses...the beaches were thick with wrecks and swollen bodies." The dead, including those who perished earlier in the town totalled 6,700.
Now if the boats were small and built for piracy they were also fast and manoeuvrable relative to the heavy Roman rafts. The Romans were said to be in full possession of any escape route by land. However the Sea of Galilee is egg-shaped, about 13 miles long and 6 to 7 miles wide at its widest point. The perimeter is not less than 30 miles. Yet the small, fast boats could not escape even during the night! It seems as if the boats must have been trapped in some very much smaller enclosure than the Sea of Galilee.
A map published with the Penguin Classics' version of Josephus' The Jewish Wars places Tarichea at the southern end of the Sea of Galilee. So also does a map published in vol.1 of Hasting's Dictionary of Christ and the Gospels, (1906) and other maps published in George Adam Smith's Historical Geography of the Holy Land. (1894) from The Palestine Exploration Survey. The latter map is interesting as it shows Tarichea as situated on a peninsular or perhaps a breakwater that protrudes into the Sea of Galilee to form a small sheltered bay. The Jordan is shown as flowing out from this bay.
Without too much imagination it is possible to construct a possible site for Tarichea on or at the start of a peninsular/breakwater that would enclose a portion of the Sea of Galilee, thereby matching the description of the disastrous naval battle of Tarichea. To match the description to the Magdala site is more difficult.
A site where the Jordan leaves the Sea of Galilee known as Kerak is a possible site for Tarichea. It was said to be located on a peninsular and is the only position on the coast which suits Josephus' description of Tarichea being washed on more than one side by the sea.4
Other evidence is provided in the literature that favors the southern site. H.V. Morton3 in his book In the Steps of the Master states that Magdala was the site of a dyeing industry while Tarichea in the south had an industry for the salting of fish. Apparently salt from the Dead Sea was brought to a site south of Tiberias. The word "tarichea" means "pickling place." The Urantia Book states that there was a fish drying industry at Tarichea. (1566)
One of the points in favor of the northern location is that Vespasian with his combined forces came up from Scythopolis and arrived first at Tiberias. One authority, van Kasteren, holds that Vespasian could have advanced on Tiberias via the plateau rather than the coast.4 Josephus1 states that Vespasian was at Caesarea-Philippi and Titus at Scythopolis before they joined forces. It was Vespasian and his forces that went to Scythopolis. If he went via the coast road, he would have first passed Magdala, the postulated northern location for Tarichea--and risked being attacked by the hotheads. After that he would have had to pass Tiberias. As he believed his forces were inadequate for engaging the Jews at this stage, it seems likely that he would have taken the plateau road. He could have returned the same way and if so, some of the objections to the southern site disappear.5 Those remaining are Josephus' statement about the locations of both Tiberias and Tarichea at the foot of mountains and the archers firing from an elevated site on the walls of Tarichea.1
There seems to be a lot of things in favor of the site at Kerak and it gets strong support4 by van Kesteren, Conder, Schurer, and Guthe (who switched his opinion away from the north site). Smith4 notes that the harbor could shelter a fleet of vessels, a statement appearing to
|
|
